Treason Paper Essay

Wikipedia defines lese majesty as disloyalty to one’s state or province. A individual who betrays their citizenship and/or revokes on an curse of trueness and in some manner wilfully cooperates with the enemy. For the intent of this paper. I will utilize the term a little more slackly. but still carry the branchings of a awful. unthinkable act. The statement for my usage of the term will be supported by plants from Edmund Spencer.Amoretti and the Epithalamion ;Phillip Sidney.The Old Arcadia ;Homily on Obedience ;and John Lyly.Endymion. or the Man in the Moon.From the plants of these writers I will do an statement for lese majesty as non merely something one can make to one’s state. but besides to one’s friends. and even to one’s ego. Treason as it refers to a state would fall into the class of legal discourtesies ; as it refers to one’s friends it would fall into the class of personal discourtesies. and in conclusion. as it refers to one’s ego it falls into the class of theological discourtesies.

It is most hard to believe of lese majesty without the pre-described reading of it being merely referred to in a military or political scene. I remember when I was a kid ; there was ever an case of someone’s feelings being hurt over words spoken or actions taken. The premiss of this has non changed with clip. merely the usage of blind and linguistic communication picks we make.

Peoples are still being betrayed. left entirely. and left keeping the bag. As one becomes an grownup. they form paradigms that cognition is filtered through in order for their heads to do sense out of life. Theology. as I will utilize it here. refers to that which is the cardinal figure of a person’s motive. idea and address spiels. and besides as it sets parametric quantities for their geographic expedition of new thoughts. So. when I say I have committed theological lese majesty. I have done something that goes against everything I believe to be true and honest.

We will get down with a transition fromThe Homily on Obedienceand how it relates to the lese majesty that we all are familiar with and that which has been ingrained within us: an discourtesy against our state.

[ I. 10. 3-275 ]YEe haue heard before in this Sermon of good order and
[ I. 10. 3-276 ]obeisance. obviously proued both by the Bibles and
[ I. 10. 3-277 ]illustrations. that all subiects are bouNlair to obey their Ma­
[ I. 10. 3-278 ]gistrates. and for no cause to defy. or withstand. or rebell.
[ I. 10. 3-279 ]or do any sedition against them. yea. although they bee
[ I. 10. 3-280 ]wicked work forces. And allow no adult male thinke that hee can get away
[ I. 10. 3-281 ]vnpunished. that committeth lese majesty. confederacy. or rebel­
[ I. 10. 3-282 ]king of beasts against his soueraigne Lord the King. though hee commit the same
[ I. 10. 3-283 ]neuer so in secret. either in idea. word. or deede. neuer so priuily. in his
[ I. 10. 3-284 ]priuie chamber by himselfe. or openly pass oning. and confer withing
[ I. 10. 3-285 ]with others. For lese majesty will non bee hid. lese majesty will out at length.
[ I. 10. 3-286 ]GOD will haue that most abhorrent frailty both opened and punished. for
[ I. 10. 3-287 ]that it is so straight against his regulation. and against his high principall
[ I. 10. 3-288 ]iudge. and anoynted in Earth. The force and iniury that is commit­
[ I. 10. 3-289 ]ted against authoritie. is committed against GOD. the common weale.
[ I. 10. 3-290 ]and the whole Realme. which GOD will haue knowen. and condign­














[ I. 10. 3-291 ]ly or worthily punished one manner or other. ( The Third Part of the Sermon on Obedience. vv 275-291 )

I chose this peculiar transition because of its coverage of lese majesty against one’s state. I included the whole transition so as to give you a good representation without any guessing refering original linguistic communication usage. Notice the strong verbalism as the writer describes how exalted is the discourse of good order. It is clearly written that to make against what it demands is to do oneself a worthless vas for the magistrate’s usage. After all. it has been proven by the Scriptures and illustration ( 276-277 ) . To be a magistrate. one was considered to be on a higher plane of being than the normal township people ; being topics bound by the Torahs of the male monarch.

Here is where the lese majesty comes in. When ideas of the male monarch and the Torahs he pronounced were less than desirable people were thought to be a Rebel. and incendiary against his stateliness. the King. So. it didn’t affair. harmonizing to the transition. whether the low sentiment of the male monarch was shared with others. it was believed that the Rebel would be found out to be perpetrating lese majesty against the male monarch ; punishable by ostracism or decease. It was more than a physical act ; it was a religious 1. particularly to those in authorization. The townsfolk were expected to accept their male monarch whether he was merely or unfair.

In this visible radiation. lese majesty is apprehensible. We can all associate to bewraying a state. and as it was back so. a King. Knowing that God was on the king’s side when these rebellions took topographic point gave them bravery to stand in the face of a coo. This transition promised that God would penalize these sinners openly and with a steadfast manus. This is still rather true today. merely our political leaders would instead make the penalizing themselves alternatively of waiting for God to make it. Mentioning back to the offense of disloyalty against one’s state. I can barely forbear from duologue refering our present quandary with Iraq. A individual in the armed forces could easy do a batch of money by geting information and selling it to the cabals within Iraq which could finally sabotage all the leaders of the two states are seeking to make.

However. lese majesty of this nature can be elusive. but merely every bit unsafe to a political system regulating a organic structure of people. Julia Walker. utilizing an extract fromTheSixteenth Century Journal. in her essayDissing Elizabeth.recounted an discourtesy against a really immature queen Elizabeth who was populating with her stepmother. Catherine Parr. Thomas Seymour married Parr after Henry VIII’s decease and was unsuitably attracted to Elizabeth. Recognizing the political addition he would see if he were to get married Elizabeth should Parr decease. were thought to be of excessively great a hazard. To halt this from go oning. rumours were started implicating Seymour in his uncouth ways holding conceived a kid whom Elizabeth was rumored to be transporting.

Although Elizabeth was non publically tried on this issue. there was still the potency for harm to her image which would reflect on her ability to be Queen. There were already probes in advancement refering family tree due to the fact that Elizabeth’s female parent was executed for incestuous criminal conversation. Connections of family tree were made between Elizabeth and Seymour which merely added to the force per unit area the immature Queen was experiencing in a often switching line of sequence. ( pp. 1131-1133 )

Given that lese majesty. in that century. was viewed as non merely an act against magistrates. but against God himself. hapless Seymour didn’t stand a opportunity. The curious thing about lese majesty is in the reading of it. Peoples from all clip epochs had paradigms by which they lived. Everything coming in to their heads. even back so was measured by that which they knew to be true. Many would squeal wrongs they did in private because the paradigm of sedition and rebellion was established by the military and political systems of the twenty-four hours.

It is impossible to hear or read something without the individual hearing or reading to construe the information any other manner besides the manner of their paradigms. “God will hold that most abhorrent frailty both opened and punished. ( 286 ) Thingss of this nature were a manner of life ; it was expected of all the topics in a land to pay court to their male monarch or queen. To non make so would be doing a individual out to be the prototype of lese majesty. If a topic was non for the male monarch or queen. they were against them. This could be bad in footings of any type of future topics desired. “Condignly” is the word used in the Homily.

It means good deserved and wholly appropriate. In Act I. scene II of Richard II. John of Gaunt refuses to take action against King Richard because he is convinced that Richard was appointed by God and to raise his manus in conflict against him would be to seek to do a base against God. He refuses to assail the liquidators of his brother. although he. excessively. would wish to be able to hold retaliation. because the individual who is most to fault for Gloucester’s slaying is Gaunt’s nephew. King Richard. So. it was non that he believed King Richard was non guilty ; it was more that he did non desire to oppose God.

Covert behavior such as address and organisation that is deemed by the legal authorization as be givening toward rebellion against the established order is a feasible definition of sedition. which is the offense of which Seymour was guilty. He didn’t raise up an ground forces. didn’t sell secrets to the enemy. or any such faithless act. However. what he did was interpreted as lese majesty. Again. we find the definition as it is interpreted by the governing organic structure of the twenty-four hours. Now. if this still holds true today. and I believe it does. we find ourselves in a predicament of differing sentiments refering affairs of security. In a address given by Ian Barker at the Aust Center for Independent Journalism Conference on the 11Thursdayof November. 2005. he states:

There is a important difference in the proposed jurisprudence of sedition as opposed to the bing jurisprudence. Under the existed jurisprudence we have a definition ofincendiary purpose– for illustration an purpose to convey the Sovereign into hatred. or to excite alienation against the authorities – and so we have assorted offenses committed withthat purpose. for illustration. utilizing incendiary words with the purpose of created public upset. ( Barker. pg 1 )

There is non much difference in what Shakespeare wrote in Richard II and what Mr. Barker had to state at this conference. Here we find ourselves analyzing the history of authors who intertwined words of lese majesty and sedition into dramas and literature that spoke openly of it. but felt as if they could make it under the pretense of theatrical playing. Modern vocals are still portraying misgiving or trust broken go forthing person sad and friendless. In the 1960’s people in America found themselves wrapped in a cocoon of peace. free love. and drugs.

The interesting thing about Barker’s remarks is that they are really near to the same thoughts and illustrations in Richard II. For illustration. Bolingbroke peacefully took Richard as captive. There was no bloody coo. no dropping of the bomb. no treasonist to knife him in his slumber ; Richard II merely went off. Although there was a rumored confederacy that leads to Richard’s slaying. it was still performed in a lacklustre manner so as to non convey un-repairable harm.

Richard. imprisoned art Pomfret Castle ponders his death:

Therefore drama I in one individual many people.
And none contented: sometimes am I male monarch ;
Then lese majesties make me wish myself a mendicant.
And so I am: so oppressing indigence
Persuades me I was better when a male monarch ;
Then am I king’d once more: and by and by
Think that I am unking’d by Bolingbroke.
And straight am nil: but whate’er I be.
Nor I nor any adult male that but adult male is
With nil shall be pleased. till he be eased
With being nil. ( scene V )









By now. Richard is to the full cognizant of his state of affairs. but still wonders how it all came to this. He sits in his cell non cognizing of the secret plan to kill him chew overing his predicament. Treasoned or King’d both at the manus of Bolingbroke. I think by now I would hold been inquiring myself. “How could I have been so blind? ” And it is these types of inquiries that leave us bewildered. and normally really angry. when lese majesty is committed against a magistrate and a friend. The linguistic communication Shakespeare uses to assist King Richard describe the arrant distain he now has for Bolingbroke is consummate. He rails on himself. Bolingbroke. and even a hapless Equus caballus that merely happens to be at that place with him.

Can you conceive of the hurting in Richard’s bosom. the torment in his psyche. or the fury in his spirit? “I was non made a Equus caballus. ” he bellows. “Yet. I bear a load. like an buttocks! ” ( scene V ) How descriptive and colourful the linguistic communication describes the emotions he is experiencing in the prison. Even in his decease he feels the treachery.

In the last stanza of this drama there are the words that tell of the torment in a man’s bosom by the title he committed when murdering King Richard.

As full of heroism as of royal blood:
Both have I spill’d ; O would the title were good!
For now the Satan. that told me I did good.
Says that this title is chronicled in snake pit.
This dead male monarch to the life king I’ll bear
Take hence the remainder. and give them burial here. ( scene V )




This is besides declarative of the 2nd type of lese majesty I want to lucubrate on: personal lese majesty.

In this point of my essay I will do the statement for lese majesty against friends. We have all done this at one point or another in our lives ; we likely merely called it something else. Remembering that lese majesty is bewraying an curse of trueness. what relationships have we seen destroyed due to an act of lese majesty ; the treachery of trust? We truly don’t have to look that difficult. it is all around us today. Even with the nuances that are used to seek and conceal the act itself. the trained oculus can descry them. This is what Shakespeare. Spencer. Lyly. and others were numbering on for without the overtones being noticed. the dramas and literature would hold lost their entreaty.

These writers were really talented. and in some instances. made their statement refering lese majesty humourous.

ONE twenty-four hours I sought with her heart-thrilling eyes. to do a armistice and footings to entertain:
all unafraid so of so false enemies. which sought me to ensnare in treason’s train.
So as I so disarmed did stay. a wicked ambuscade which lay hidden long
in the close covert of her guilefull eyen. thence interrupting Forth did thick about me throng. Too lame I t’abide the brunt so strong. was forst to give my ego into their custodies:
who me captiving consecutive with strict incorrect. have of all time since me kept in barbarous sets.
So Lady now to you I do kick. against your eyes that justness I may derive. ( SONNET XII. )




Notice the usage of words in the first and 2nd lines of the sonnet. He speaks as if the eyes had a bosom to experience emotion for the sight they were sing. but the phrase “make a truce” Tells of a struggle of kinds. He was seeking for footings he could understand so he would cognize what to make next. But. alas. he is stricken by these eyes and describes himself as being a prisoner in treason’s train. or head covering. The message he was acquiring from those eyes was illustrated to the full by the last line as he cries for justness. He felt as if a lese majesty. a treachery of trueness was in the plants. and he was pleading for justness. or ath the least. flight from it.

“Trust non the lese majesty of those smiling expressions. ” is the beginning of sonnet XLVII. and opens more the ailment of non cognizing how to defy the trap of lese majesty. With treason being such a deplorable act against a friend. one could merely conceive of the hurting the betrayed was experiencing during this act of lese majesty. The rebellion that was taking topographic point in the bosom of the author was giving in to the eyes that were so life-engulfing that he was forced to set his words on paper and do them a vocal of plaint.

Merely as fish semen to the come-on on the hook clip and clip once more. so this lover will turn once more and once more to the eyes that betray his bosom. It is an art. this war traveling on between the two of them ; one side seeking for flight but non happening it ; the other side pouncing down like an bird of Jove for the putting to death. Even while seeing the quarry all bloody and near decease. the bird of Jove still smiles as if she is playing with her quarry. Last. the stanza ends with the very thing that the lover knows as a nuisance. yet is enjoyable in a unusual manner.

Treason in relationships has produced some of the most beautiful music and poesy. Art work and picture taking has besides played a big function in conveying the hurting of lese majesty of friends and relationships. The concluding sonnet I will utilize is XLVIII because it besides portrays the willingness of lovers to subject themselves to both pleasance and hurting. It is like cognizing intoxicant can be hooking. yet go oning the ingestion of it until its claws are deep within the drinker so they have no flight path.

Now even conveying the paper on which the authorship was done into the lese majesty. it is described as the bearer of the affair to avenger her anger. It was the mechanism that helped her understand. yet it was besides the one thing that fire could devour wholly. However. this did non keep the lese majesty at bay. Rather it fueled it even more. and the calls for justness continued. Trying to ground that it was neither heresy nor treason that conspired. and the penalty he suffered was unjustly pained.

This is such a good illustration of lese majesty as it relates to friends and lovers. To believe that we can really perpetrate such atrocious Acts of the Apostless against each other and sleep well at dark seem farcical. Yet. it happens every twenty-four hours. Think of afternoon telecasting with all its sordid soap operas and other shows of how people break oaths and promises on regular footing. The sarcasm. though. is that is precisely what makes the shows so popular. Is it our interior desire to be able to make as they do and still unrecorded with ourselves? Are we among the ranks of those who could declare as Spencer does:

Let no false lese majesty seeke V to ensnare.
Nor any awful disquiet one time annoy
the safety of our ioy:
But allow the dark be calme and quietsome.
Without stormy storms or sad afray:
Lyke as when Ioue with fayre Alcmena ballad.
When he begot the great Tirynthian groome:





Or lyke as when he with thy selfe did prevarication.
And begot Maiesty.
And allow the mayds and yongmen cease to sing:
Ne let the forests them answer. nor theyr eccho ring. ( Epithalamion. Eighteen )


The lamenting for the lese majesty is eventually done and now the two lovers want nil more than to hold all of nature satisfy their impulses for love. peace. and felicity. It is rather the narrative of a lover’s wrangle. non much different than one would anticipate today even though centuries and civilizations separate us from them. Finally. I offer one last illustration on the impact of treachery displayed is a drama written by Shakespeare titledLove’s Labor Lost. In Act IV scene III Biron plaints:

Not you to me. but I betray’d by you:
I. that am honest ; I. that hold it sin
To interrupt the vow I am engaged in ;
I am betray’d. by maintaining company
With work forces like work forces of faithlessness.
When shall you see me compose a thing in rime?
Or moan for love? or pass a minute’s clip
In sniping me? When shall you hear that I
Will praise a manus. a pes. a face. an oculus.
A pace. a province. a forehead. a chest. a waist.
A leg. a limb?









Here we witness an statement for the importance of doing a vow and maintaining it. It is rather sad that these jobs plagued the people of that clip epoch. but it is even sadder that we have non learned from it. The comedies are still written today and are seen global. yet the same sad fact remains that curses are made to be broken. vows will non be upheld. matrimonies will stop in hatred. and there will ever be wars and rumours of wars.

Yet even in all of this. there is a certain conjoining of the first lese majesty of which I wrote and the one of which I write now. See the thought in the 2nd book ofThe Old Arcadiawhere Plangus was shipwrecked due to treason. It is spoken of as something expected from a old action. In the 7th chapter of the 2nd book. the sea was said to be faithless. and the air current oppressive ; this implying that the act of lese majesty is more than merely an act against one’s state. It is described here as an act of nature and in other narratives an act of the will against a neighbour or friend.

Then once more. in Book III. chapter II we find a nice scene of friends basking what appeared to be a banquet of all right fruits and vino. About the clip they got good and comfy 20 armed work forces came out of the forests and captured them. The whole incident was described as a lese majesty against them. I find this really interesting in this book because of the nature of the act. Treason. earlier now. has been described as either a legal misdemeanor of trust. or an ill-favoured act against a friend. now we find it mentioning to perfect aliens assailing this group in the forests.

I am traveling to include another transition fromThe Old Arcadiaas I build this subdivision of my statement for lese majesty found in chapter four of the 3rd book.

But because he knewe. how violently rumors doo blow the sailes of popular iudgeme [ n ] ts. & A ; how few at that place be. that can discerne betweene trueth and truthlikenes. betweene showes and substance ; he caused a iustification of this his action to be written. wherof were sowed abroad many transcripts. which with some rubrics of probabilitie. might conceal indeede the foulenes of his lese majesty ; and from true common-places. bring downe most false applications. For. get downing how much the duetie which is owed to the countrie. goes beyond all other dueties. since in it selfe it conteines them all. and that for the regard therof. non onely all stamp respects of kinred. or whatsoeuer other friendshippes. are to be laide aside. but that euen long-helde sentiments ( instead builded vpon a secreate of gouernement. so any grou [ n ] vitamin D of truthe ) are to be forsaken.

Notice the strength of the ardor that is applied to the one committing lese majesty. Any relation to others. or friends. lovers. or anyone else ; it all laid aside when you are found guilty of lese majesty. Thinking about today’s society where lese majesty is merely heard of in political relations or the military. I can’t aid but inquire what impact it would hold on relationships if we started sing treacheries as lese majesty. Treason carries so much more weight than what most would likely give a friendly relationship. In this transition from Sidney we find that it is a responsibility. something owed to the state. and in some instances it was proposed that possibly something a little less than the truth was offered as informant against the accused.

In the same book. chapter seven. we discover yet another description. or definition of lese majesty. It is when the palace is under onslaught and fright is get the better ofing Clinias. he is rather certain that everyone will perpetrate lese majesty to remain alive. So. in this transition of literature we get the feeling that all countrymen would make anything to remain alive. But. all is non lost. for in chapter 14 we find two gentlemen talk abouting each other into a conflict. One accuses the other of lese majesty. I believe. in an effort to spur him into contending blindly so as to easy get the better of him ; which. of class. would intend that God was with him and non the other merely because of the act of lese majesty.

Let me now change the class of this statement to include the theological lese majesty I introduced at the beginning of my statement: lese majesty against oneself. Man is a funny animal. In that it is impossible for him to be wholly nonsubjective. particularly when it comes to life. every adult male has his ain divinity.

With divinity deriving acknowledgment with some kind of religious connexion. whether it be Christianity. Buddhism. Islam. or whatever the instance may be. it is rather assuredly a belief in something larger than our ego. As each adult male matures in life he forms his paradigms based on his milieus. influence from outside beginnings. and readings of life events. This is of import because every adult male has a bound. It is like an unseeable line drawn in his logical thinking abilities that cause him to react or respond to life events in a certain mode.

As this relates to our texts we have used this semester. I see it as a individual who commits an act that causes them to experience less than homo. In Sidney’sArcadiathere is a transition that supports my determination.

“Alas dame. why seek you at my custodies your dishonor and my shame? How daring you venture your honor in the power of a alien. who probably would utilize it to his glorification and your reproach. Besides. you know I love one whose worth and truth must non be hurt or blotted in my mistake. my life non worthy to fulfill the offense should her unsoiled trueness suffer for my wickedness. ”

The thought supported here is one that states award is of no value if sin brought shame to the 1 he loved. This would be a lese majesty against the adult female he loved. but more than that it would be a lese majesty against himself doing him to experience like he is unworthy of life itself. Honor and populating above reproach is a baronial life style. but cognizing what we know of the nature of life. we will all let down ourselves at one clip or another. To anticipate more than that seems a small loony. yet in the in-between ages it was a manner of life for some.

Man will travel to great lengths to avoid perpetrating lese majesty against themselves. and in the narrative of Arcadia we find such a adult male. His name is Basilius. He has traveled to a state brooding in hopes to debar a calamity from bechancing his household. One girl would be stolen by a deluxe adult male. the other would fall in love uncouthly. that he would perpetrate criminal conversation with his married woman. and that he would be overthrown as male monarch. For this to go on to him and his household because of something he did. would be the worst thing he could of all time endure.

As the malady unfolds and the impostors are shown to be who they truly are. and Basilius finds himself to be the victim of lese majesty. bemoans that which has befallen him. However. “Cleophila” . who is truly the deluxe adult male. begins to howl in suffering as it becomes clear to him what has transpired.

Transformde in skewe. but more transformde in mynde.
I cease to stryve. with duble Conquest foylde ;
For. suffering Y mee. my powers all ( I fynde )
With owtewarde force. and inward lese majesty spoylde.


For. from withoute. came to myne eyes the blowe.
Whereto. myne Inwarde thoughtes did faintly yeelde:
Bothe these conspirde pore Reasons overthrowe.
Faithlessly in my ego. therefore have I lost the feelde.


And therefore myne eyes are plaste still in one sighte.
And therefore my thoughtes can thinck but one thing still:
Therefore. ground to his servantes gives his righte.
Therefore ys my power transformed to youre will.
What Marvell so I take a Womans hewe?
Since. what I see. thincke. knowe. ys all but yow?




The words used are chosen really good to separate his torment from what the other participants in this game were sing. There is a spot of a sarcastic touch at the terminal of this last stanza that shows the wit of the whole thought of lese majesty ; in all of its signifiers. For there to be a power there must be one due its prestigiousness. Yet we see here that the power of the magistrate was transformed into what the adult female wanted it to be.

The chief point to see in these stanzas is the fact that the lese majesty was inward. It was non unlike these writers to handle such serious affairs with a touch of wit. It made for good theatre and besides gave a certain light-heartedness to the subjects.

Endymion. though. is rather the different narrative. While these last writers could be believed. even in those parts where the truth was stretched and re-imagined. to believe the narrative of Edymion requires a spot of phantasy. Mythology is normally attributed to the Greeks and Romans. and this is no different. Endymion has several different readings and is recounted in more than a few narratives. For our intent we will trust on John Lyly’s narrative as it unfolds to state the narrative of the Moon falling in love with a beautiful male child.

Treason in this narrative is the hardest to wrap a head around because it deals with really misunderstood feelings. These feelings are in the inner-most being of a person’s psyche. It is the portion of people that makes them love. hatred. or devotes their life to person. something. or some belief without any logical account to back up it. Here we have Endymion who is loved by Tellus and Cynthia. who in world is the Moon. Interestingly plenty. Tellus’ name means the Earth. So. for all practical intents you have a adult male who is loved by the Earth and the Moon. The quandary unfolds as he ponders the thought of kiping everlastingly so he can be with Cynthia.

No remainder. Endimion? Still unsure how to settle thy stairss by twenty-four hours or thy ideas by dark? Thy truth is measured by thy luck. and thou art judged unfaithful because thou art unhappy. I will see if I can juggle myself with slumber. and. if no sleep will take clasp in my eyes. yet will I embrace the aureate ideas in my caput. and wish to run by chew overing ; that. as coal black. which no fire can sear. is yet consumed with sweet relishs. so my bosom. which can non be bent by the hardness of luck. may be bruised by amative desires. ( Lyly. Endimion 2 )

Watching the hapless lad uncover his love for the Moon is much like watching something from the Scifi Channel on overseas telegram or orbiter T. V. It is rather entertaining. though. to watch him bewray himself by giving up that which is existent for that which he can non hold. In this subdivision he recites his love for Cynthia. If he can non fall asleep he feels a good rendition of the ideas in his caput might fulfill his desire for the Moon. As it is in most instances of love in literature. there is that unwavering spirit of comedy or calamity. When sing lese majesty. one would believe of serious project and charges brought before a advocate for judgement to be rendered.

Well. a judgement is rendered in the instance of Endymion. it’s merely non what you think it would be. He is set on being with Cynthia for the remainder of his life. even if it means bewraying all that is existent and cherished in life. The lese majesty in this narrative is truly seen by what Cynthia does to Endymion. She vexes him. in a manner. to do him to believe he can be person he is non. Mythology self-praises of some 50 stars as cogent evidence that Cynthia and Endymion had kids while he was in his deep slumber on that fatal bank by the H2O. yet the terminal of the narrative leaves me believing that Eumenides. Endymion’s faithful friend is on his manner back to wake him from his phantasy and be the friend he truly needs in this confusing clip.

Geron. the guard of the well advises Eumenides “As much difference as there is between beauty and virtuousness. organic structures and shadows. colourss and life. so great odds is at that place between love and friendly relationship. ” ( passage 3 ) Friendship is betrayed in this small drama. and yet it is the indispensable component that Endymion needs. This lese majesty. so. is unexpected by Endymion. even though he commits it against himself. Geron explains:

Love is a chameleon. which draweth nil into the oral cavity but air. and nourisheth nil in the organic structure but lungs. Believe me. Eumenides. desire dies in the same minute that beauty sickens. and beauty fadeth in the same blink of an eye that it flourisheth. When hardships flow. so love wane ; but friendship standeth stiffly in storms.

Time draweth furrows in a just face. but addeth fresh colourss to a fast friend. which neither heat. nor cold. nor wretchedness. nor topographic point. nor destiny can change or decrease. O friendly relationship. of all things the most rare. and hence most rare because most first-class. whose comfort in wretchedness is ever sweet. and whose advocates in prosperity are of all time fortunate! Vain love. that. merely coming near to friendship in name. would look to be the same or better in nature! ( terminal of transition 3 )

So. which is more of import? At this well Eumenides can claim the love of his life. or deliver his friend from what would be. in his sentiment. a sad. fatal terminal. But. of class. all’s good that ends good. Everyone is united with their just love. and Cynthia gets to be the heroine in the terminal. allowing spell of what she wanted for the greater good of world. Removing the guilt of Endymion’s lese majesty to himself. and returning the love of a adult female to him every bit good was the wagess given to the one’s she cared about the most.

In decision. there is more to treason than meets the oculus. or the understanding. every bit far as that goes. There may be some lese majesties in front for the following participants of Shakespeare. Spencer. and Lyly. but for now we will settle for the three we can cover with ; viz. . lese majesty to a state. a friend. and one’s ego.

Plants Cited

The Homily on Obedience

Walker. Julia M. erectile dysfunction. Dissing Elizabeth: Negative Representations of Gloriana.

Sixteenth Century Journal. Vol. 29. No. 4 ( Winter. 1998 ) . pp. 1131-1133

Australian Centre for Independent Journalism 23 November 2006

University of Technology. Sydney 04 December 2006

World Wide Web. acij. Greenwich Mean Times. edu. au/news/sedition_081105_ianbarker. pdf

SparkNotes Richard II Act V. scene V. 2006 04 December 2006

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. sparknotes. com/shakespeare/richardii/section2. rhtm

Spencer. Edmund.Amoretti and the Epithalamion.

Amoretti XII. XLVII. XLVIII. Epithalamion Eighteen

Sidney. PhillipThe Old ArcadiaBooks 2: 7 ; 3: 2. 4. 7

ShakspereLove’s Labour Lost04 December 2006

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. engl. uvic. ca/Faculty/MBHomePage/ISShakespeare/LLLCourse/html

Lyly. JohnEndymion: or The Man in the MoonPassages 2 and 3

hypertext transfer protocol: //www. engl. uvic. ca/Faculty/MBHomePage/ISShakespeare/LLLCourse/lyly2. hypertext markup language