Theoretical Positions of Freud, Adler, Jung, and James Essay

Historically. some of the greatest penetrations of psychological analysis stemmed from the heads of ordinary work forces and adult females. In many respects. most psychodynamic theories come from depth psychology surveies that have been conducted over the coevalss. Science has worked meticulously to set up quality and proof to structuralist positions ; nevertheless it was functionalism motion that were more qualitative in nature. Although non straight associated with the motion. psychologists such as Sigmund Freud. Alfred Adler. Carl Jung. and William James made is possible to explicate the intent of the human consciousness. They all wanted to detect a manner to better the quality of the lives of persons instead than concentrate on laboratory research ; a more direct attack to mapping the head. Their fluctuations in theory were designed to concentrate on the foundation of human behaviours and the best manner to supply accurate analysis and intervention to those behavior incentives. Sigmund Freud: Positions and Major Disagreements

Conscious and Unconscious: Freud’s Theories – Disagreement
In respects to Freudian psychological science. Vaughan wrote. “the imposing. self-asserting methods of the arrangement…made ideal the rise of forceful obstructor in its train ( 1927 ) . James and Freud have the most important differences in positions. James felt self-contemplation and self-reflection is the manner to understanding life within the mental provinces ( Goodwin. 2008 ) . However. Freud believes that behaviour is regulated by the unconscious head. This was made apprehensible through free association and dreams. Ultimately. Freud thought professionals could calculate out the province and person based the province on the analysis of his or her dreams ( Freud. 1911 ) . But. self-reflection was what James believed ( Hart. 2008 ) .

Freud’s Sexual Motivations – Disagreement
Adler and Jung. who once related with Freud. found dissensions with Freud’s theory of sexual motives and psychosexual developments ( Vaughan. 1927 ) . These work forces argued that puting utmost prominence on the motive through sex would cut down single behaviours to merely one motive that is cardinal ( Vaughan. 1927 ) . Adler wanted the theory he created to go the chief stimulation and foundation through his psychological theories replacing Freud’s accent on sexual motive. He would replace this with self-reflection ( Vaughan. 1927 ) . Freud would concentrate on forces held internally to include ; sexual motive. biological temperaments. and struggles. Adler’s theories concentrated on societal factors ( Goodwin. 2008 ) . The most similar positions out of the four work forces where Jung and Freud ( Goodwin. 2008 ) . Again Freud would be questioned by Jung and his ideas within sexual motives. reasoning the theories of analytical psychological science ( Goodwin. 2008 ) . Although Jung’s positions can be comparable to Freud’s. Jung would widen the theory to encompass a position that was more advanced ( Goodwin. 2008 ) . Alfred Adler and the Individual Psychology

Alfred Adler was an Austrian physician. clinical psychologist. and the chief laminitis of the school of single psychological science. He strongly believed in the importance of the feeling of lower status or the lower status composite. The lower status composite is good known as a major key of developing personalities. An lower status composite is a deficiency of dignity. doubting oneself. uncertain of ability. or experiencing as if you are non up to criterions. He believed this occurred in the subconscious and caused people to cover. This resulted in people either making transcending good. or neglecting miserably ensuing in behaviour considered unnatural by society. He believed that people were whole persons. and from that came his “Individual Psychology” . Freud disbelieved Adler’s thoughts and believed they were excessively contrary so he had all members of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society expel Adler. Despite the fact Freud believed Adler to be wrong. he still took his thoughts earnestly and called them. “honorable errors” . Carl Jung

Than we had Carl Jung who was an analytical head-shrinker who is considered as the paradigm of the dissenter through the impact of his scission and the motion that he created when he became analytical. He was the boy of a Swiss clergyman of a community. he went to school and studied the medical field but he specialized in psychopathology he besides worked for a renowed psychiatric infirmary in Zurich. Carl Jung had a strong personality and was besides thought of as rather facinating he was introduced to Freud in 1907. They hit it off and he would shortly be facinated by the prestigiousness and personality that Carl Jung had he shortly seen in him the boy that could maintain the endurance of depth psychology. He truly believed in hectometer and was so into his personality that it didn’t even face him that Jung was non a Jewish like he was.

Soon after Jung was going to the US and became the first president of the “International Association of Psychoanalysis” . He traveled the universe for a piece and did several analysis throughout the US he besides became more and more off from his surveies as he was aging. But he still got to carry through a batch and besides got to fund his ain schools which truly attracted a batch of people he was a maestro in what he did and truly got to carry through a batch in the field of Psychology. Compare and Contrasts

As you can see all of the psychologists mentioned above had the same end: explicate the intent of the human consciousness. Freud as the first to develop the footing of all psychodynamic theories: depth psychology. Understanding certain behaviours requires insight into the emotional responses that motivate specific reactions ; sexual development was paramount to human behaviour. He believed that the human mind consisted of three parts: the Ego. Super-Ego. and the Id ; all parts of the sexual developmental procedure. On the other manus. Adler’s theory was more straight-forward: he believed that these three parts operated as a individual unit ; the cardinal subject of functionalism. Alder was the first to set up the thought that an individual’s personality was a direct contemplation of their witting. The psychologist that met these two in the center was Carl Jung. Like Freud. Jung believed all behaviours were triggered by incentives. merely he thought that the incentive was based on an lower status composite ; and like Adler. he believed that the human mind acted as a individual unit.

Jung was most important for his usage of word association to understand unconscious responses to external stimulation. His attempts proved that the unconscious head is able to supply responses independent from the witting head. And eventually. James William emphasized the impression of a “stream of consciousness”—an active agent of mental action that is invariably altering ( Goodwin. 2008 ) . Although each psychologist had a alone position of how the human mind operated. they made it possible to explicate the consciousness. Decision

Some of the greatest penetrations into psychological analysis included Freud’s depth psychology ; Adler’s individuality ; Jung’s analytical position. and James’s “stream of thought” analogies. Because of their extended attempts to research the human consciousness. they are frequently referred to as the “founding male parents of modern psychological science. Together they validated the significance of functionalism over structural linguistics ; the truth lies in the intent non the design. Each psychologist provided a alone attack to set up what the intent of the consciousness ; the footing of all human behaviour. Variations in their theories provided many different attacks to aim those behavior incentives. These great psychologist jointly improved the quality of life for many persons over the coevalss.


1. Freud. S. ( 1911 ) Interpretation of Dreams ( 3rd edition ) Retrieved May 12. 2014 from EbscoHost 2. Goodwin. C. J. ( 2008 ) . A History of Modern Psychology ( 3rd ed. ) . Hoboken. New jersey: Wiley. 3. Vaughan. W. ( 1927 ) . The psychological science of Alfred Adler. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 21 ( 4 ) . 358-371 EbsocHost 4. Durbin. P. ( 2004 ) . Alfred Adler. Retrieved May 19. 2014. from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. alfredadler. org/alfred-adler 5. Fisher. M. ( 2010. May ) . Psychology History. Retrieved May 19. 2014. from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. muskingum. edu/~psych/psycweb/history/adler. htm 6. Kowalski. R. . & A ; Westen. D. ( 2005 ) . Psychology ( 4th ed. ) . Hoboken. New jersey: Wiley. 7. Jung. Carl. ” The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology. Ed. Bonnie Strickland. 2nd erectile dysfunction. Detroit: Gale. 2001. 347-348. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 19 May 2014