The Science of Attraction Sample Essay

Nothing is possibly more of import in people’s lives than their relationships with others. and accordingly. it is non surprising that wishing and loving have become a major focal point of involvement for societal psychologists. Known more officially as the survey of interpersonal attractive force or close relationships. this country addresses the factors that lead to positive feelings for others.


By far. the greatest sum of research has focused on wishing. likely because it is easier for research workers carry oning short-run experiments to bring forth provinces of wishing in aliens who have merely met than to look into and detect loving relationships over long periods. Consequently. research has given us a good trade of cognition about the factors that ab initio pull two people to each other. The of import factors considered by societal psychologists are the undermentioned:

Proximity. If you live in a residence hall or an flat. see the friends you made when you foremost moved in. Opportunities are. you became friendliest with those who lived geographically closest to you. In fact. this is one of the more steadfastly established findings in the literature on interpersonal attractive force: Proximity leads to wishing.

Exposure. Repeated exposure to a individual is frequently sufficient to bring forth attractive force. Interestingly. repeated exposure to any stimulus—a individual. image. vocal. or virtually anything— normally increases the possibility that we will wish the stimulation more. Becoming familiar with a individual can arouse positive feelings ; we so reassign the positive feelings stemming from acquaintance to the individual himself or herself. There are exclusions. though. In instances of initial negative interactions. repeated exposure is improbable to do us to wish a individual more. Alternatively. the more we are exposed to him or her. the more we may dislike the person.

Similarity. Folk wisdom tells us that birds of the same plume flock together. However. it besides maintains that opposites attract. Social psychologists have come up with a clear finding of fact sing which of the two statements is right: We tend to wish those who are similar to us. Research workers including Prof. Susan Cloninger. believe that similarity leads to wishing due to the undermentioned grounds: ( 1 ) Confirmation of worldview

( 2 ) Knowledge of other’s traits
( 3 ) Inference that the other will wish us ( Reciprocity of Liking Effect )

Physical Attractiveness. Why do advertizers utilize beautiful showbiz personalities alternatively of dependable experts to back merchandises? Why was Marian Rivera chosen to state you that Maxipeel will assist exfoliate your tegument? Wouldn’t a prima skin doctor do a more convincing occupation at something like that? This. and many other cases. demo what researches have found in the manner people perceive physical visual aspect: Beauty=Good. Peoples presume that beautiful people besides possess other desirable traits ( halo consequence ) . doing beautiful people seem more sympathetic.

The inquiry stands nevertheless. ‘what do we intend when we say physically attractive? ’ Some researches suggest that beauty has a strong cultural footing. Burmese adult females. for illustration. add neck rings throughout their lives as a mark of beauty. Some tribal African adult females put lip home bases as a mark of beauty. Many Filipinos prefer just tegument over their ain morena ( o ) skin color while those with just skin think cocoa brown teguments are alien.

Thin vs Juicy Figure
There are indicants based on pictures and sculptures that during the Hellenistic and Renaissance periods in art. sexy and beautiful meant juicy. However. modern manner and the media today tell you that altering times show a penchant for dilutant figures. Harmonizing to some sociological research. in countries where nutrient is scarce. people considered fuller-bodied adult females to be more attractive.

Childlike Features vs Mature Features
On the other manus. other psychologists and advocates of the theory of development have besides proposed that physical attraction is determined based on man’s unconscious desire for generative success. thereby. unconsciously on the look-out for indexs of wellness. For adult females. child-like characteristics such as big eyes. little olfactory organ. full lips and a shorter and less broad mentum ( compared to forehead ) are features usually considered beautiful. Healthy tegument and hair are besides considered vernal and hence. marks of beauty. For males. a strong jaw and wide shoulders indicate maleness and adulthood.

Proportion and Symmetry
Proportion is the harmonious agreement or relation of parts within a whole. Symmetry. on the other manus. is the exact correspondence of signifier on opposite sides of a dividing line. The more proportioned and symmetrical a face is. the more physically attractive it is said to be.

Facial Contrast
In a research on sexual dimorphism. respondents were asked to find whether the individual on an image is male or female. In world. the same face was presented twice to the participants. altering merely the contrast in the image. The consequences are no surprise. nevertheless. The image with greater contrast was considered more feminine.

These factors entirely. of class. make non account for long permanent friendly relationships. Alternatively. these factors facilitate the development of relationships. For illustration. a study by Psychology Today sought to place the factors critical in friendly relationships. In a questionnaire answered by some 40. 000 respondents. people identified the qualities most valued in a friend as the ability to maintain assurances. trueness. and warmth and fondness. followed closely by supportiveness. candor. and a sense of wit. While these are some traits that help keep friendly relationships. the factors for initial wishing contribute to the creative activity of chances for people to finally develop long and meaningful friendly relationships with others.

On the other manus. another survey by the same publication showed that life alterations ( 77 % ) . deficiency of reciprocality. treachery and jealousy/envy were common factors for the terminal of friendly relationships.


Whereas our cognition of what makes people like one another is extended. our apprehension of love is more limited in range and late acquired. For some clip. many societal psychologists believed that love is as a phenomenon excessively hard to detect and analyze in a controlled scientific manner. However. love is such a cardinal issue in most people’s lives that finally societal psychologists could non defy its temptingness.

Sternberg. one of the taking research workers in the field of interpersonal attractive force and relationships cited three ( 3 ) basic constituents of love that. when. combined can bring forth different types of love.

committedness – the initial knowledge that one loves person and the long-run feelings of desiring and the determination to keep love

intimacy-the feelings of intimacy and relatedness

passion-made up of the motivational thrusts associating to sex. and physical intimacy

These constituents are the ingredients to the seven common types of love harmonizing to sociologists and societal psychologists peculiarly Sternberg:

Infatuation ( lone passion is present ) .
Wishing or Friendship ( merely familiarity is present ) .
Empty Love ( lone determination or committedness are present ) .
Asinine Love ( passion and decision/commitment are present ) . Romantic Love ( familiarity and passion are present ) .
Companionate Love ( familiarity and committedness are present ) and Consummate Love ( familiarity. passion. and decision/commitment are present ) .

Another research worker ( Ainsworth ) on the other manus. focused research on fond regard manners. Ainsworth believed that how people handle their relationships with other people is influenced by their perceptual experience of their lovability and the trustiness of others. These perceptual experiences are said to be based on experiences with childhood caretakers.

Secure Attachment- Peoples with unafraid fond regards are said to hold antiphonal health professionals when they were immature. Findingss show that people with this sort of fond regard frequently perceive themselves as sympathetic and worthy. They besides believe other people are by and large trusty. Hence. being abandoned or left entirely is non something to be concerned about.

Avoidant Attachment- Peoples with avoidant attachment tend to hold distant health professionals. Although they perceive themselves as worthy and sympathetic. they suppress familiarity because they do non swear others easy and prefer non to hold intimate relationships.

Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment- These people are found to hold been raised by inconsistent health professionals. They have the inclination to believe themselves unworthy and non really sympathetic but they think others are trusty. They frequently strongly want to be intimate with others but are dying that others will non desire them.

With the information given. many have been led to inquire what makes two people successful in a loving relationship. Based on researches. peculiarly those of Nathaniel Branden. successful twosomes behave in the undermentioned ways:
1. They express their love verbally.
2. They are physically fond.
3. They express their love sexually.
4. They express their grasp and esteem.
5. They participate in common self-disclosure.
6. They offer each other an emotional support system.
7. They express love reciprocally.
8. They accept demands or set up with defects.
9. They create clip to be entirely together.

These features are non every bit present in every happy love matter or relationship. Even with a happy relationship. each spouse does non exhibit them every bit at all times. But it is strongly dubious that anyone could indicate to a happy relationship that did non demo most of these traits.

The Love Lab
Another series of researches by Gottman ( for 10 old ages ) has allowed him to place some behaviours that could foretell matrimonial failure and loss of love in a twosome. Dubbed as the Love Lab. Gottman observes three-minute pictures of married twosomes reasoning over a peculiar subject. He so analyzes their communicating forms every bit good as their behaviour and physiology to find which statement forms are ‘okay’ and which 1s are likely to destruct a matrimony. Results show that

( 1 ) showing criticism—negative manner of stating the other individual of his defects

( 2 ) contempt—a combination of choler and disgust for another individual
( 3 ) defensiveness—extreme sensitiveness to unfavorable judgment

( 4 ) stonewalling—delaying treatment of jobs or barricading the possibility of communicating

are forms that are largely seen in unsuccessful twosomes. On the other manus. softening statements and utilizing wit tended to assist in maintaining a matrimony intact. based on consequences.