World is sort of like a memory. Everyone has their ain di? erent thoughts of what it should be but none are needfully the truth. For illustration two people who were both in the great depression could hold wholly di? erent ideas on the di $ cult % Maines. While one could hold lived on the streets fighting every twenty-four hours to ‘nd nutrient and H2O. the other could hold been among the few rich people and lived in luxury. Both of them would hold really di? erent memories about how % Maines were back so. The same goes for world. While we all might hold on what is existent or non our ideas on world could be on di? erent sides of the spectrum.
The de’ni % on of world is “the province or quality of holding being or substance. ” If something is existent to me so that’s my world and same goes for person else. so who’s to state that at that place isn’t more than one world and why is humanity so interested in world? I believe that humanity is so interested in world because we are of course funny. They say wonder killed the cat and I believe that stating is really true. We as worlds ever want our ques % ons answered be it a simple ques % on like two plus two or a complex ques % on like what is world with no existent reply yet.
This wonder is merely portion of our nature and it can take to compulsions. Some people are so haunted with ‘nding the reply to ques % ons that they devote their whole life to it and this compulsion consumes them. Even if we found the reply to world. how much would it alter our mundane lives? The ques % on that we so longed for the reply to wouldn’t even do a grade on how we live our lives and the individual who found this reply would hold commi1ed his nut % re life to ‘nd this now insigni’cant reply. I’m non stating that I’m non funny about the reply because.
I am but I know that this wonder is much more unsafe than the reply is deserving. Let’s say that there is an reply to world ; it is so far off from our cognition right now as worlds. It would be like seeking to explicate consciousness to animate beings. We as worlds know who we are and are cognizant about ourselves and others this is what separates us from animate beings. Even if we could somehow communicate with animate beings it would be about impossible to explicate our feeling of consciousness to them. It would be like an foreigner who travelled to earth seeking to explicate faster than light velocity travel to us.
It would be excessively much for us to manage. Alternatively of seeking to ‘nd the one true reply to reality everyone should hold their ain construct of world and what they believe. We already have illustrations of this today. We have atheists. Chris % autonomic nervous systems. Jews. Muslims. Hindus. and more that all have their ain construct of world. But all of them try to coerce their constructs on others. None can merely accept that some people have di? erent positions. Personally I am a Chris % an largely because I asked myself if I were to decease right now I would wish to believe in something that would assist me in the a8erlife.
If I died and God asked me why he should allow me into Eden being an atheist wouldn’t aid my instance. With me being a Chris % an though I s % ll acknowledge that we try to set our positions on other people excessively. Just because people a $ liate with a di? erent group doesn’t mean they have the same construct of world as them. Even though I associate myself as a Chris % an I wouldn’t see my construct of world the same as theirs. we merely portion common chief thoughts of world. Just as Americans portion things about world that other people in di? erent states don’t.
For illustration we believe we landed on the Moon while people in other states might believe it is a fraud for celebrity. The country we grow up in. our parents. and even things such as what we look like can a? ect our thoughts of world. What I know to be an semblance can be person else’s en % rhenium world. The people in North Korea live in an semblance to us but to them it is their world. They believe that Kim Jung Un is the best thing since sliced staff of life. while we believe he has brainwashed them into believing that by censoring and other methods.
It’s non right for us to state them what to believe but this shows how reali % Es can overlap from things such as where one lives. Another illustration that is now an semblance to us was magic back in medieval % Maines. They believed people could command things that no 1 else could through thaumaturgy. but we now know that these people we tricked through scientific discipline. Some scientific discipline is really difficult to believe so the lone logical thing to them was to label something that you don’t understand as thaumaturgy. but we now know as scientific discipline. Now even scientific discipline is used to explicate things we don’t understand.
Every faith and scientific discipline has their ain thoughts on how we came to be. Science has used the large knock theory and evolu % on to explicate how worlds came to be even though they don’t have signi’cant grounds to do this a fact. They cri % cize faith for non holding proof when they don’t have much themselves. I’m non stating that thought is incorrect I’m merely stating that what we one time used scientific discipline for is gone. We used scientific discipline to halt the thought of “magic” by doing a system where you have to supply grounds. adequate to do it a fact. Now we merely do something we don’t understand into a scien % ’c theory. Science has about become a new faith.
I have no job with a new faith but I think that we should maintain scientific discipline separate from faith. Science is what we used to bring forth facts and faith is a serious of beliefs that act on religions and non grounds. I love scientific discipline but I besides believe in faith and by de’ni % on they are two di? erent things. Science could one twenty-four hours be used to ‘nd out the ques % on of what is world but it can’t do that if it acts like a faith. Alternatively of replying the ques % on of what world is I decided to demo how there can be more than one world because everyone has their ain world.
Since everyone has their ain world I don’t believe there will of all time be a % me where everyone agrees on one construct of world. but if there comes that twenty-four hours science will be needed to explicate the truth of world and for that ground scientific discipline needs to remain separate from faith. I believe that by holding our ain reali % Es this helps divide us persons and shows our alone power as worlds. Just because your world convergences or disagrees with person else’s doesn’t mean they need to alter.
This merely shows that you are really closer to their world than person whose world doesn’t have anything to make with yours. and who knows they might be the lone 1 with the existent reply to the ques % on what is world.