Ibsen and Strindberg Sample Essay

Ibsen and Strindberg are two dramatists of the same period. the Industrial Revolution. This is a clip when the universe is doing a great alteration in how it runs. Not merely is concern altering. the manner people think is altering excessively. Peoples are get downing to oppugn the ways of society. For an illustration. inquiries are originating on how adult females should truly be treated. Such impressions give manner to really controversial theater. Ibsen and Strindberg strongly show how these issues were reasoned.

It by and large seems as though Ibsen and Strindberg had a really different position on adult females and their functions in society. However. in a closer position you tend to see that their positions on adult females are non that different. In Ibsen’s A Doll’s House and in Strindberg’s Miss Julie it looks as if the adult females are mere objects. The adult females appear more similar marionettes or playthings to the work forces. The work forces use the adult females to fulfill their demands and non much else. There does non look to be any regard at all from the work forces towards the adult females. However. every bit far as the adult females go. they are expected to give full award and regard to the work forces who treat them in such a mode. An illustration of this from Ibsen is Torvald holding Nora dance the Tarantella in A Doll’s House. The Tarantella is non a suited dance for a married adult female to be dancing but Torvald has her dance it anyhow. This shows how Nora is merely a trophy that Torvold shows off to all of his friends.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Her intent to Torvald is to do him look good. without her making that. she is about unpointed to him. With Strindberg. a perfect illustration is Jean demoing no compunction for Julie after she must endure the effects of him and her sleeping together in Miss Julie. He merely dismisses her and claims nil. knowing that she is now ruined. He is convinced that she is merely seeking to utilize him. as did Julie’s female parent to Julie’s male parent. Jean knows that all adult females are conniving and are trying to pin down work forces into back uping them. Therefore. Ibsen and Strindberg concur that adult females are viewed non as people but as belongings. The struggle in sentiment happens non in what these writers believe adult females are but what they think adult females should go Besides they differ in how Ibsen and Strindberg believe society should make to adult females.

Strindberg believes that all adult females are out to acquire the work forces. He sees adult females as bloodsuckers who want to suck the life and money out of work forces. He views adult females as evil animals. He shows this through Julie’s female parent pin downing the male parent. Julie’s existent female parent was non a countess but a common man who was a truster in women’s release. and when Julie’s father offered his manus in matrimony to let the female parent to be raised in stature the female parent denied. She did hold to hold him as her lover and they produced Julie. Finally the male parent forced the female parent to get married him and out of retaliation. the house was set on fire the twenty-four hours after the insurance ran out. This forced the male parent to have a loan that was really the mother’s money. everlastingly indebting him to her. Just as in this instance. Strindberg viewed all adult females as arch and felt they needed to be dealt with by non giving them any rights so they do non hold the power to make this to work forces.

In great contrast. it appears as though Ibsen believes that adult females merit to be more honored than they presently were. At first. it seems as though Nora in A Doll’s House is merely every bit bad as Julie in Strindberg’s drama because she has gone behind her husbands back to acquire a loan by giving bad signatures. The dirt behind this loan could destroy her hubby merely when he is traveling up in the concern universe. However. Nora is seeking to do things right without destroying her hubby. This act entirely shows that Ibsen contrasts with Strindberg that all adult females are evil. In the terminal. Nora leaves her hubby. This act is a self-sacrifice that is used to salvage her husband’s repute. Therefore. as you can see. this shows that Ibsen feels that adult females need to be more respected in their determinations. From this. it shows that adult females could give more to society if they were allowed to do more determinations by holding more rights.

In a expression from the hereafter to the past. most people tend to believe that Ibsen was right and Strindberg was incorrectly in their feelings about adult females but non all people. It could be that most people are merely biased on behalf of Ibsen because of the manner society is transformed to today. The release of adult females has changed the manner society reacts towards the issues sing the intervention of adult females. Today society appears to still be undecided the same issues of whether adult females are being treated reasonably. This may be an on-going contention until the terminal of clip.