Han China & Classical Athens DBQ Essay

Classical Athens and Han China were different due to their signifiers of authorities. the relationship between the person and the province. their positions on adult male and nature and their background information.

Within the background information of both Athens and Han China there are really apparent differences between the two. The first papers shows the maps of both the imperiums side by side. The Han Empire is much bigger than the Athens city state Attica which is a mere 50 stat mis long. while the Han Empire stretches over 2400 stat mis long. The size difference entirely shows how the Empires would hold developed otherwise. Since Attica is smaller. the people are nearer together. therefore it would be easier to develop a democracy at that place. Han China. nevertheless. is really large and everyone is spread out so it would be really hard to regulate if every citizen had a say in the determinations.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The 2nd and 3rd paperss show the differences in size and distribution of the population in both imperiums. The differences here are clear. Han China is approximately 206 times greater in population than Athens. In Athens about 37 % of their population are slaves while in China about 7 % of their population are slaves or what they call. “mean people. ” The bulk. about 90 % . of the population in the Han Empire consists of peasant husbandmans and some skilled urban workers. In Athens. husbandmans were really valued and the bulk of the citizens there were landowning husbandmans. A map of population denseness would be really helpful in understanding the differences between the imperiums. This would demo where most agrarian took topographic point because the mass population is husbandmans and slaves.

CONCLUSION*************

Han China and Classical Athens authoritiess are highly different. Han China’s authorities was purely centralized. with an emperor as their supreme and godly swayer ; the Son of Heaven. Peoples believed that Heaven chose the individual who was ready to govern the Empire. Many people questioned how Heaven does this. In papers 6. a duologue between Mencius. a pupil of Confucius. and Wan Chang. Mencius’s pupil. Chang asks Mencius a few inquiries of Heaven taking it’s following boy. Mencius’s reply was that Heaven does non talk but reveals itself by Acts of the Apostless and workss ; Heaven sees with the eyes of its people and hears with the ears of his people. Document 7 negotiations about how Han China’s authorities system runs. Heaven selects the emperor. the exclusive swayer. but he needed people to assist him govern.

Therefore he appointed governors to each portion of the Empire and so. in bend. they placed functionaries at smaller countries. During the Han Dynasty. the authorities decided to construct and spread out bureaucratism. The administrative officials would hold to travel through an early signifier of a civil service test in order to gain a law-making place at phases of authorities such as local. regional and federal. However. Stearn describes the Han Empire as the largest political system in the classical universe. but Stearn’s bias can be seen here and must be considered. However. Classical Athens’ authorities is a democracy. non wholly a modern democracy like the United States. but a democracy however.

Document 4 is a address by Pericles. a Grecian solon. which talks about the empire’s qualities of their authorities. Any adult male. regardless of their societal category can be elected to keep office. Pericles negotiations really extremely about his authorities. “… we are instead a function theoretical account to others. ” His point of position on the authorities system may be affected by the fact that he is the General of that imperium so he would be biased toward their authorities.