Dressing for Success? Essay

Benjamin Franklin one time said. “Those who would give up indispensable Liberty. to buy a small impermanent Safety. merit neither Liberty nor Safety. ” Today’s society is built upon the values of freedom. independency and the rights of adult male. The freedom of look and the basic rights that were fought for are taken off by rigorous school frock codifications or compulsory school uniforms. Everyone should hold the freedom to have on what makes them comfy. The picks in vesture and accoutrements can increase self-esteem. Clothing picks can besides convey consciousness to a peculiar voice of sentiment every bit good as doing it a statement of suiting in with a crowd because the demand to be a portion of something is a basic demand for all worlds particularly school aged kids and teens.

When thought of allowing pupils wear their pick of vesture versus school uniforms the argument continues for both sides. After researching some of those arguments I found the instance of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School where the tribunal said that a student’s freedom of look in school must be protected unless it would earnestly interfere with the demands of appropriate subject. The vesture we wear is an look of our independency and right to show ourselves for who we are. School uniforms will make nil but cut down on a student’s individualism. Therefore pick in day-to-day wear is non merely our look of ego but a small gustatory sensation of independency and finally increasing pupil assurance and classs in school.

Many people say that uniforms or rigorous frock codifications help develop the subject of the pupil. This could non be further from the truth. School uniforms merely create more regulations for a pupil to follow. taking off from the primary map of school: instruction. School is about instruction. societal and academic. and uniforms or rigorous frock codifications do non promote a acquisition environment if one is ever either uncomfortable or stressed about have oning the right outfit that will run into rigorous regulations. School uniforms or a separate school appropriate vesture closet take up money and clip that could be spent on other activities.

Parents have to pass money on their children’s uniforms or an full 2nd ‘school appropriate’ closet when they already have apparels that would be merely every bit good. School territories have to set money. clip. and attempt into developing uniforms or such rigorous frock codifications by implementing the frock codification once it has come into consequence that doesn’t deflect the pupils but the instructor who is on changeless vigil to direct a pupil to the office to travel place and alteration hence taking that pupil off from larning and isn’t acquiring an instruction what kids are in school for? Why non pass this hard currency on needful school equipment alternatively and direct instructors to acquire their pupils attending by guaranting their acquisition in meaningful and disputing ways?

Last. pupils do non like uniforms or rigorous frock codifications such as the 1s in topographic point in the Sapulpa School District where pupils are prohibited from have oning any rakes or cryings in any denims and male childs are non allowed to have on earrings. After researching other 6A country schools and their frock codification policies. they are really indulgent necessitating safe vesture with modest garb. Jenks. Union and Broken Arrow Public schools allow the more modern manner of denims that have some stress rakes or togss every bit long as they are below the longest finger when the arm is resting at their side. Male childs are allowed to have on earrings every bit good. After looking into the more indulgent frock codification policies I went a measure farther by looking into their academic tonss based on the 2011 High School Union terminal of direction trial tonss where they have increased every twelvemonth since 2003 in every topic.

Not merely do they seek to maintain the pupils in school by utilizing a less restrictive frock codification that is modest and lets them show their individualism but have besides adopted the Community School theoretical account that Tulsa Public Schools pioneered in the country where physicians. tooth doctors and other professionals are brought to the schools to increase a feeling of place. household and finally attending. This theoretical account is my concluding proving theory that schools should hold basic frock codifications that do address modesty but allowing the pupils choose to have on what they want to have on merely as the pupils of the old decennaries chose to show themselves with poodle skirts. hippy hip huggers or the micro miniskirts of the 1970’s. Let the pupils have the freedom of pick to have on what they want for vesture or jewellery for both male childs and misss every bit long as it doesn’t distract from their instruction.

Finally let’s maintain childs in school by demoing them regard for personal picks and non directing them place every clip a instructor finds a bantam hole in some denims below the knee…after all our concluding finish is a knowing grownup who besides fights for the freedoms of our state by being a responsible determination doing citizen? Another quotation mark that farther speaks for the right of the person is by President Thomas Jefferson along with our establishing male parents when they penned the Declaration of Independence in 1776. “We hold these truths to be axiomatic. that all work forces are created equal. that they are endowed by their Godhead with certain inalienable rights. that among these are Life. Liberty and the chase of Happiness. ”

Work Cited

* Franklin. Benjamin. Historical Review of Pennsylvania. 1759 * Jefferson. Thomas. Declaration of Independence. 1776
* Union Public Schools Student Policy Handbook 2011-2012 Dress Code * Union Public Schools Website ; World Wide Web. unionps. org “End of the Year Instruction Scores” * Jenks Public Schools website World Wide Web. jenksps. org “ Student Dress Code” * Broken Arrow Public Schools website World Wide Web. Ba. k12. ok. us “Student Dress Code” * Wikpidia. “Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District” Web. * Clifford. Stephanie. “A Small Give in the Dress Code. ” Editorial. Web. * Freeman. January. “Dress Code Further Defined” Web. * Rodriguez. Erica. “Traffic. Dress Code Biggest Issues for First Day of School” ( 23 Aug. 2012 ) . Web.