Censorship v Pornography Essay

1. 0 Introduction:

This paper seeks to find whether there is footing to utilize censoring to cover with erotica. based on critical appraisal of the women’s rightist debates about the issue. In add-on. an scrutiny on how erotica is made similar to harlotry. drugs. and other fringy offenses will be analyzed given its roots in moral judgements and the equivocal nature of its injuries. Knowing the possible injuries that are associated with erotica and the grounds for the demand for its ordinance will besides organize portion of the analysis with the terminal position of measuring whether censoring is the solution to erotica.

  • Analysis and Discussion

2. 1 What is erotica?

To understand erotica. there is a demand to look at it from its background up to present times. Webb ( 1995 ) attempted to analyze more deeply by looking back at the sexual patterns that have been depicted in many civilizations. from Grecian. and Roman to Chinese and Nipponese. for centuries. She found that the term erotica was merely used to depict some of these word pictures in much recent times. She explained that the term arose together with certain facets of the oppressive sexual morality developed by the capitalist governing category during the 19Thursdaycentury. She blamed the polarisation of the Victorian period which caused spliting the line on what was “respectable” and what was non between women’s groups ( Webb. 1995 ) .

The footing of this reputability was related to the ‘dangers’ of female gender and its ordinance and that adult females were required into an inflexible dichotomy. Womans were hence categorized into “good” adult females who were nonsexual. “chaste’ before they have their matrimony and “pure” after. Therefore. Webb argued that sex was merely necessary for reproduction non pleasance. and the effect was to restrict the same to get married heterosexual twosomes. As a consequence. adult females that were found to hold sexual activities outside this inflexible regulation were condemned and which finally led to harlotry ( Webb. 1995 ) .

The issue of erotica was felt more in the some states than others. Webb ( 1995 ) cited about the Torahs of erotica and lewdness in England and the US which covered much more than others as censoring in there is extended to the production. sale. and ownership or transacting of written and in writing sexual stuff. The issue even went every bit far as censoring preventive or abortion drugs. devices and information ; and doing it a offense to hold homosexual behaviour between accepting male grownups. The consequence of these prohibitions was besides to give constabulary greater drumhead power over working category adult females and kids because of menace of bear downing adult females and kids the misdemeanor of the Torahs which may non be evidently be made to work forces ( Webb. 1995 ) .

The impression of erotica can non be detached from its signifiers of art entree to which was restricted to capitalistic work forces claiming to hold some kind of academic involvement. As such censoring was directed merely against adult females. kids and working-class work forces that resulted to favoritism. The restriction or limitation to entree to pornography limited occasions for oppugning the supposed to be proper values for gender. for adult females and for the household. Webb ( 1995 ) explained that the pattern had the consequence of the holding and doctrine reenforcing the household system. which was understood to be the basic unit of capitalist society.

The consequence of this pattern is to restrict adult females into the private country of the place and their domestic labour. This caused these adult females non to make trade goods for sale on the market. Geting unpaid for their work at place. women’s rightists believe that this resulted to their economic trust upon male parents and or hubbies as farther toughened by their limited entree to instruction and decently paid work.

If of all time they get employed they will finally be paid the lower rate. They besides lost control over their birthrate and look of gender. To do affairs worse. society has criminalized misdemeanor of erotica and this has affected the adult females even more. Sexual freedom was hence curtailed during the 19Thursdaycentury ( Webb. 1995 ) .

2. 1. 1 Specifying erotica and its jobs

The dramatic alteration that has happened with erotica since the term was foremost used in the 19Thursdaycentury is merely merely obvious. Webb ( 1995 ) explained that during that clip there was nil about what is scientific. medical. artistic or popular context to be exempted from the liability for go againsting erotica. It was merely by the 20Thursdaycentury erotica when freedom could be had from erotica on the claim of being scientific or artistic virtue.

Pornography so was defined under the general line as something that is produced for the intent of bring forthing sexual rousing. holding no other “redeeming” characteristic. This is based on the premise that to put out deliberately to bring forth sexual rousing is awful but if the chief aim of the work is scientific or artistic. and the possibility of sexual rousing is merely incidental. so these higher intent may pardon the publication ( Webb. 1995 ) .

Given therefore the definition of the erotica. it would intend that erotica is comparative to the oculus of the spectator and in which. instance it becomes an immorality and non an art for those who can non explicate that is an art or non scientific to those who are uneducated.

Therefore erotica could be defined in footings of suppression and containment of gender and sexual rousing which confuse things. Webb ( 1995 ) argued that images of gender can be positive and affirming and she cited the instance of many sapphic and cheery male definitions and positive images of their gender that have played an of import portion in their battle for democratic right and against persecution.

She put in analogue that feminism had likewise redefined gender functions of maleness and muliebrity. gender. and sensualness by utilizing positive positions and avowals of pick and experimentation instead than passiveness and submissiveness. By so holding positive avowals. sexual footings like what is titillating and what is adult could be delineated when decently debated upon and tested out so as to dispute the old morality where it was defined by olden times that gender itself is risky and parlous to adult females ( Webb. 1995 )

What can be seen hence is a confusion as to proper definition of erotica and its properness of specifying as such would look to depend on less figure of who are against it or deficiency of sufficient figure of those show can show themselves that erotica is non evil to them. If such is the instance. it would look that degree of adulthood in footings on moral belief is something that other people or the province can order upon the members of the community particularly the adult females although the latter are already in their maturity.

To aim of erotica definition is merely needed if one is to do a jurisprudence about erotica but as admitted by Kuhn ( 1988 ) erotica is “social construct… topic to historical fluctuations. ” It could hence be established that erotica is a affair of civilization where morality is comparative. What is titillating to one civilization may be adult to others ( Webb. 1995 ) .

2. 2 What is censoring?

There are two positions on the affair of censoring. There are those who are against and there are those who favor ( Rodgerson and Wilson. 1991 ) of its usage to command erotica. While both positions espouse the causes how to advance women’s rights. their attacks how to contend for their causes are different. Webb ( 1995 ) cited women’s rightists groups like Dworkin and MacKinnon who elevated the abolishment of erotica to a scheme for emancipating adult females.

Dworkin ( 1981 ) stated that erotica is the belief that could explicate all signifiers of women’s subjugation and hence she espoused censoring the same. The pick to censor erotica to emancipate adult females is based on the position that women’s repression is caused by the power of an inherently female gender. It assumes that all work forces are hibernating raper. in the devising to be activated by erotica. Thus it was said that erotica is the theory and colza is the pattern ( Webb. 1995 ) .

The proponents’ premise that work forces are rapist waiting to be activated by erotica could non be said to be already established. Therefore on the footing of the great chance of incorrect premise. erotica so could non merely be solved by censoring. Until scientific grounds therefore is established what is assumed could be validated through empirical observation. it is truly really unsafe to do such an premise since Torahs that would be passed would non hold besides logical if non significant footing to really turn to the issue of erotica right.

Expressing dissension on the premise about work forces in the forbiddance erotica. Webb ( 1995 ) explained that this is a biological fatalist position that does non let much range for women’s release but instead it was more an effort by single adult females to wholly separate themselves from any likely contact with work forces. She argued that if all work forces are inherently oppressors of all adult females so adult females may merely every bit good give up fighting now ( Webb. 1995 ) . She therefore saw the inappropriateness of the premise that work forces are presumed raper.

She argued that although people are socially conditioned to act in certain ways. those who espouse the belief that work forces are presumed raper. needfully disregard the really of import component of uneasiness. brooding and concluding power. and emotional response. Mentioning contradiction with scientific grounds. Webb ( 1995 ) asserted that to see work forces as programmed for force non merely endorses the most conservative position of human nature. it besides absolves work forces of any duty for their actions.

The statement that work forces are programmed or conditioned to ravish of adult females absolves work forces of duty is well-founded because it presupposes the absence of pick or freedom which is an component in offenses or codified misdemeanor of legislative acts. Freedom of pick is necessary to keep one accountable but to enforce the belief that work forces are programmed to move would get the better of the really intent of specifying offense where there is an premise that work forces are waiting adult females to ravish after reading the so called “pornographic” stuffs.

Coward ( 1982 ) supported this latter position when she attacked the position of an built-in aggressive male gender. Coward reminded that the position implies that any look of male gender will be oppressive to adult females. Thus she argued like Webb that the battle must be given up as adult females should retreat from any public. or even private. geographic expedition of gender in order to avoid male use ( Webb. 1995 ) .

To reason therefore that censoring is the solution to violence against adult females is blending up violent images and violent Acts of the Apostless. Portrayal of colza and colza itself are evidently different although connexion could be noticed. Since the two are non indistinguishable. it is incorrect to handle them the same manner. Censoring or censoring a description or image of a violent act is non covering on the act itself or its causes. Banning was based on the incorrect premise and the incorrect premiss. To compare a image with the existent act would be losing the point by truly confounding the issue that would amount to an overkill and it has the consequence of portraying that adult male is truly evil waiting to ravish adult females.

Making this. nevertheless. would go against the right to freedom of look. which is one of the built-in rights of the persons. It is hard to conceive of how would one attesting in tribunal who was a victim of colza. to state people of the bad experience without at least utilizing some word picture or illustration. It would be hard excessively for research workers to garner grounds if they can non even take a image of the offense scene affecting colza victim if the latter act would be equated with the act of ravishing. How about the tribunals. will they be charged for erotica for seeking purportedly pornography misdemeanors because of the word picture of gender made in the class of the test? The statement to compare word picture to the existent is merely absurd.

2. 3 The women’s rightist debates about the issue of erotica.

The arguments of women’s rightists about the issue of erotica have something to make with turn toing the issue of sexism and the proper attack to work out the same. Webb ( 1995 ) argued that sexual images can be both positive and negative. She explained that images can dispute the old stereotypes of adult females as inactive and gender as unsafe. by showing alternatively titillating imagination of women’s gender as enjoyable and active. She presented that adult images can besides stand for force. maltreatment and debasement.

Finding the manner on how to cover with the two sides of gender and its imagination in today’s society is the Southern Cross of the issue among feminist. Hence censoring is a controversial issue among feminist as it seems to be the most noticeable solution offered on the tabular array by those in power to work out erotica.

Answering hence whether censoring of erotica is the most effectual scheme or whether it merely deals with the images and non the Acts of the Apostless of force directed against adult females is an interesting inquiry to women’s rightists. It is besides asked whether implementing censoring could brush away positive geographic expeditions of gender through the infliction of a new inhibitory morality. Will censorship liberate adult females is besides an issue by these women’s rightists ( Webb. 1995 ) .

Webb ( 1995 ) explained that fact adult females had won many parts additions over the last two decennaries and these have generated a higher consciousness of sexism. particularly among immature adult females. She admitted that while many of these additions are now under onslaught. adult females of today have more picks and have outlooks as a consequence of their liberalisation as compared with the yesteryear ( Webb. 1995 ) . That adult females now can anticipate traveling university. acquiring a occupation and having equal wage as against the absence of these about three decennaries ago must so be strong indicants of greater rights for these adult females.

2. 4 The word picture of adult females in all countries of lives

Confronting the portraiture of adult females in all countries of their lives is a conflict that feminists must contend. Webb ( 1995 ) brought out the fact the adult females are ne’er absent from the magazines or Television plans. newspapers. or from advertisement that uses sex and women’s organic structures to sell merchandises. She added that at the same clip society seemed to be obsessed with sex. researching our gender. particularly for adult females. is actively repressed.

She noted an illustration done 1992. where the federal authorities banned the distribution of a diary. theFact and Fantasy File Diarythat was produced by the Family Planning Association to supply information to immature people on gender and sexual wellness ( Webb. 1995 ) . She argued that censoring the publication of these stuffs on the land of being adult is merely hedging around the job of sexism ( Webb. 1995 ) .

2. 5 How is pornography similar to harlotry. drugs. and other fringy offenses?

Pornography can non be similar to harlotry. drugs and other fringy offenses since censoring the erotica really violates freedom from look and censoring the same creates more injury. The injuries that are associated with erotica as described by those who are back uping censoring may hold no footing at all and there is non ground to compare word picture of colza with existent colza. There is no known research that would demo that is a great correlativity between the figure of read adult stuffs and offense committed in relation to gender as a consequence.

Although this was what was propagated by those who support censoring. the US Supreme Court has spoken that the regulation to implement forbiddance of adult stuffs violates freedom of address. It would look therefore that if any forthcoming or bing jurisprudence on erotica if there is any could be truly challenged in the Supreme Court for the latter to declare it unconstitutional. An unconstitutional jurisprudence. codification or regulation would bring forth no consequence of therefore would confabulate no right on the portion of hatchet mans to collar lawbreakers and no duty on the portion of the supposed topics would be expected.

2. 6 What are the possible injuries that are associated with erotica?

The possible injuries that are associated with erotica include the possible sexual maltreatments against kids and adult females as a consequence of failure to modulate the same. The claims of those who support censoring could be legion because of the effort to compare word picture of the act to the existent act but as argued earlier word picture is different from the existent act. Therefore for the intent of this paper said feared injuries are non given accent since at that place in scientific footing to confirm the presence of existent injuries in erotica that should be addressed decently by the passage of Torahs that would punish its misdemeanors.

2. 7 What are the grounds for its ordinance?

The ground for the ordinance of erotica is to forestall the possible maltreatments that could be committed as a consequence of ill-conceived usage of information. The fact that it should be regulated and non banned appears to be the more antiphonal solution to the job. It is for this ground that films should non be banned but instead reclassified to accommodate proper audiences and in the execution of who could watch certain movies is a affair of ordinance and non censoring.

2. 8 Is censorship effectual in covering with erotica?

Given therefore the background of erotica. one could merely inquire whether the job is decently defined. If non decently defined. would it be right so to hold censoring as the solution? The rightness therefore of the solution to pornography would depend on the cogency of the premises that were made. By this paper non holding seen any grounds that would formalize the premises made. it could non easy accept censoring as a solution.

In relation whether censoring is the solution. Webb ( 1995 ) said doing a jurisprudence on erotica “throws up the quandary of the producer’s purpose as opposes to the consumer’s response. ” Thus she cited an illustration where an writer or painter may mean his or her work to be titillating or a signifier of societal commentary but another individual may see it as adult. As cogent evidence. the novel entitledMercy written by Dworkin ( 1990 ) was itself attacked as one to be diagrammatically depicting the uninterrupted colza. anguish and humiliation of the chief character in the novel ( Webb. 1995 ) . Dworkin was in consequence beliing herself in this regard as she adopting censoring of any word picture but her novel violates the regulations that she is contending for.

Given the onslaught on Dworkin’s work. it can be assumed that the purpose was to expose force against adult females. non that it be read for sexual exhilaration but as Webb ( 1995 ) said. Dworkin’s novel is precisely the kind of stuff that could be banned under the Torahs she herself proposes.

What does this mean so? The supposed manner of Dworkin to make her audience in composing the book had to utilize some linguistic communications that could be understood to portray sexual imaginativeness or word picture and if evaluated on the criterion of what is obscene so such work should besides considered obscene. One may reason that Dworkin may be merely seeking to explicate what is adult. Precisely. that is what is meant by the difficultly of merely depicting anything about sex to be adult without truly holding to state or utilize the words related to its definition ( Webb. 1995 ) .

Possibly being moved by anti-pornography authors’ beliefs. protagonists of censoring that include Andrea Dworkin and Catherine MacKinnon. sometime in 1983. drafted an regulation passed by the Minneapolis City Council to give adult females the right to convey to tribunal manufacturers. distributers. Sellerss and/or exhibitioners of erotica once these people feel being harmed by the stuff. The regulation was nevertheless disapproved by the city manager ( Webb. 1995 ) .

A revised version of this statute law was passed by the Indianapolis City Council. but was besides unsuccessful after holding been declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court on the land of freedom of address misdemeanor ( Webb. 1995 ) . The Supreme Court’s holding declared the regulation unconstitutional could merely intend that the power of freedom of address is paramount that to publicise it to educate people and allowing them to show themselves to detect what truly are good and bad for them is an built-in human right.

It is non the publication that is bad but it is the act of individual who will move on the footing of whatever 1 senses utilizing his or her power of perceptual experience. On the other extreme. a raper need non see a image to ravish a adult female whom that adult male has decided to ravish. The immorality of something should still depend on the freedom of a adult male to move on what one sees or hears and non needfully be coming from the so called “pornographic” stuffs.

A place taken by those prefering censoring where erotica is defined within the expressed images of debasement and force against adult females. has really moved for more power through statute laws ( Webb. 1995 ) . As cogent evidence. Minneapolis Ordinance had that erotica is “the sexually expressed subordination of adult females. diagrammatically depicted whether in images or in words… adult females are presented dehumanised as sexual objects. things or commodities…who enjoy hurting or humiliation. . in positions of sexual submission… reduced to personify parts” ( Kelly. 1988. pp. 54-55 ) . It is really clear from the definition that mere word picture is already a misdemeanor in erotica.

A major job with the said jurisprudence is that. although women’s rightists may cognize what is degrading and dehumanising to adult females. it is non the women’s rightists who will do the determination in tribunal. It is the Judgess who are dominated by work forces who have the power to specify what is sexually moral and what is non. This is a world that must be accepted. Webb ( 1995 ) cited a Canada tribunal instance where a reinterpretation of bing lewdness jurisprudence along the lines of the Dworkin/MacKinnon regulation. was used to prohibit the sapphic magazine Bad Attitude and caused the foray of a sapphic and cheery bookstore.

The other side of the issue hence does non travel for censoring as the solution for the simple ground that the act of censoring will non set a halt to pornography. Thus to run for censoring is evidently non merely. Pornography could non hence be equated to harlotry ( Arcand and Grady. 1993 ) . drugs and other fringy offenses for they belong to different kingdoms.

The first is merely word picture or portraiture of Acts of the Apostless while the latter are existent Acts of the Apostless. No admiration attempts to do an regulation that would forbid the same by groups adopting censoring ended with being vetoed by a city manager and another effort to revise the same regulation resulted to be struck as unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court.

There are nevertheless still harms ( Stark. 1997 ; Lottes et. Al. Weller. 1993 ) that could be associated with erotica for which ground it should still be regulated by holding selective censoring particularly to kids who may non hold the mental capacity to understand things while they are immature. But as they mature an instruction that would assist them understand about gender should be taught to them instead than fall backing to finish censoring.

When these kids become grownups it could non be assumed that they do non cognize how to pattern their freedom of pick and mind in being morally responsible for their Acts of the Apostless. If so erotica may be defined where adult females are depicted to be dehumanized sexual objects. so by all average censoring appears to non the logical solution but instead it should be the proper instruction of people how should worlds act utilizing said natural gender given to them.

One statement that is forwarded by those who espouse censoring is that erotica is large concern ( Alexander. M. . 2002 ) therefore censoring it will disrupt on capitalism’s ability to do net income from the subjugation of adult females. Although erotica is admitted as a large concern. it does non follow that it will non be sold if banned since capitalist economy has unremittingly created new demands and wants to work the economic construct of unsated demands and wants. Business could ever come up with a fluctuation of projecting sex even in playthings or internet games as gender will ever be a portion of the lives of worlds.

It is hence explicating to people about the deductions of incorrect usage of gender and how they benefit from commanding the same that would be the better solution than wholly halting by forbiding its word picture. Baning does non halt erotica. for it will merely force it into the resistance that would in consequence come out in some other ways. The same unforesightful solution has the consequence of besides censoring it as subject for public treatment and as locale to hold constructive sexual options.

Censoring of erotica has been the subject from many states but it would look that no jurisprudence has been successful in really halting erotica. The minute a jurisprudence is made to ban erotica. people’s demand to understand the topic or to prosecute in any signifier has its ain manner of coming out in figure of ways.

To oppose censoring should non be taken as condoning. ignoring or deprioritizing runs about the frequently aggressive and normally misogynist word picture of adult females in a society where capitalist economy has no mark of declining. Webb ( 1995 ) explained stated that adult females have a responsibility to be counted in the most effective how to make away with images which are oppressive and male chauvinist. These adult females should non seek to hold erotica banned. but by get downing a much more comprehensive argument about sex.

The same aim could besides be attained by runing for better sex instruction in different schools at different degrees. Their heads should be opened to knowledge instead than deny so them capacity to be cognizant of the issues that would let them to exert their freedom to take. By doing people more cognizant of their gender. there is a greater opportunity to make more informed and responsible behaviour every bit good as societal attitudes that would let free look of gender would more within the range of these adult females.

  1. Decision

It can be concluded that the construct of erotica appears to hold its roots in the yesteryear that resulted into grouping adult females into classs on who are “good” . who are “chaste’ and who are pure. Bing felt more in some than other states. erotica is closely related to relativity of morality in different topographic points. Where there are more prohibitions. the greater are the effects on the power of those who are to implement the jurisprudence against the manque topics like the kids. working category adult females and propertyless work forces. It hence has is links with the construct of equality particularly among adult females where the construct dawned on them as a manner of know aparting them as against work forces who are non capable to said prohibition or censoring.

As could be expected based on it relativity characteristic. definitions of erotica could change for different provinces or legal powers. Since the intent of specifying the same is for the authorization to modulate or to forbid the same. the jobs could differ and whoever will be included as topics in the said jurisprudence will of course be capable to its power and possible maltreatment by those who will implement the jurisprudence. It could hence be in footings of the suppression. containment of gender and sexual rousing depending on whose point of position. that the term could be defined. This therefore produces the consequence of monolithic confusion.

Bing hence called a societal concept. the construct of erotica depends at different times ( Moon. R. 2000 ) . so what to some is titillating is already adult to others. To reason therefore for censoring is to reason to halting the same in different ways depending on how erotica was defined. Certain women’s rightists like Dworkin and MacKinnon supported the abolishment of erotica as a manner to free adult females.

This scheme necessary takes the position that women’s repression is caused by the power of an inherently female gender. With the premise that all work forces are hibernating rapers. who are in the devising to be activated by erotica. one could already deduce the possible effects of doing such an premise. Thus a point in clip was needfully arrived at where the word picture of an act was already being equated with the act.

The other side of the coin argues that to do the unsafe premise about work forces that they are prone to ravishing which calls for censoring erotica will non needfully ensue in adult females release as espoused by Dworkin’s group. To prolong the premise approximately work forces as inherently oppressors of all adult females would amount reding to merely give up fighting now as this has the consequence of taking from the work forces the duty for their Acts of the Apostless. This therefore is clearly oppressive to adult females.

It should hence be apprehensible to set one’s places with those of adult females as to the women’s rightist debates about the issue of erotica because of the deep reverberations of their understanding or dissension of Torahs that will specify erotica and that will halt the same. Noteworthy is the fact the mere prohibition of image word picture can do the old stereotype of adult females as inactive and gender as unsafe. Censoring therefore is non the reply with the job that was amiss defined. instruction is.

Simple ordinance is hence recommended instead censoring. Regulation of class extends to restricting entree to kids of some stuffs while they do non understand the issues clearly. Peoples should instead hold a argument about sex or that they should be a run for better sex instruction in schools. or a more informed and responsible societal attitudes to look of gender should be made possible. By so making people are presumed intelligent and free and heightening the same through instruction would do their lives more meaningful. More meaningful lives of class would intend better society and better society should intend fewer offenses as people would go more responsible of their picks.

Bibliography:

Alexander. M. ( 2002 ) The First Amendment and Problems of Political Viability: The Case of Internet Pornography ; Harvard Journal of Law & A ; Public Policy. Vol. 25

Arcand and Grady ( 1993 ) The Jaguar and the Anteater: Pornography Degree Zero ; Verso

Campbell. J. ( 1988 ) . “Pornography — Is it a Feminist Issue? . “ Australian Feminist Studies. No. 7

Coward. ( 1982 ) R. “Sexual Violence and Sexuality. ” Feminist Review. No. 11

Dworkin. A ( 1990 ) . Mercy. Secker & A ; Warburg. London

Dworkin. A. ( 1981 ) . Pornography: Work force Possessing Women. Women’s Press London

Kelly. L. . “The US Regulations: Feminism and Censorship Prism Press. Great Britain. 1988”

Kuhn. A. ( 1988 ) . quoted in Campbell ( 1988 ) . “Pornography — Is it a Feminist Issue? . “ Australian Feminist Studies. No. 7

Goosefishs et. Al. Weller ( 1993 ) Reactions to Pornography on a College Campus: For or Against? ; Sexual activity Functions: A Journal of Research. Vol. 29

Moon. R. ( 2000 ) The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of. University of Toronto Press

Rodgerson & A ; Wilson ( 1991 ) Pornography and Feminism – the Case Against Censorship. Lawrence & A ; Wishart Ltd. . London

Stark ( 1997 ) Is Pornography an Action? : The Causal vs. the Conceptual View of Pornography’s Harm ; Social Theory and Practice. Vol. 23

Webb. E. ( 1995 ) Pornography and Censoring: Silence or pick? . { www papers } URL. hypertext transfer protocol: //www